: Why can't I beat the Stars 30/60?
Last year's stats for LO8 on Stars:

This year's stats:

Is the 30 that much tougher to beat than the 75 because of the regular players in the 30 who can't sew their vaginas shut and play the 75? That's my best guess, because I'm obviously tightening up according to the average number of players at the table. Could also be a small sample size issue, and I'm either a winner at 30 longrun or a loser at 75... but the results look consistent over this timeframe, and the stdev's are at 20BB/100 for both levels, meaning that after 10k hands the CI is only about 10BB wide.
It's also evident that I'm loosening up from last year to this year, I take this as an indication that I need to stop playing when I'm stoned off my ass. For some reason when I take down a couple bowls I start to see all these weird ways that I might be able to snake the occasional pot here and there that I don't normally "see." Fun when it works out, like here:
POKERSTARS GAME #9721638744: OMAHA HI/LO LIMIT ($75/$150) - 2007/05/02 - 21:53:44 (ET)
Table 'Koon IV' 10-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: BV37 ($2000 in chips)
Seat 2: Elliesa ($4335.50 in chips)
Seat 3: fat_nutz ($2298.50 in chips)
Seat 5: mrb513 ($8066 in chips)
Seat 6: bostoner ($2267.50 in chips)
Seat 9: berdyfish ($3072 in chips)
fat_nutz: posts small blind $50
wausau1: is sitting out
mrb513: posts big blind $75
BV37: posts small & big blinds $125
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to fat_nutz [Kd 9c 2c 4h]
bostoner: folds
wausau1 has returned
berdyfish: folds
BV37: raises $75 to $150
Elliesa: folds
fat_nutz: calls $100
mrb513: calls $75
*** FLOP *** [Js Qd 4c]
fat_nutz: checks
mrb513: bets $75
BV37: raises $75 to $150
fat_nutz: calls $150
mrb513: calls $75
*** TURN *** [Js Qd 4c] [8c]
fat_nutz: checks
mrb513: checks
BV37: bets $150
fat_nutz: calls $150
mrb513: folds
*** RIVER *** [Js Qd 4c 8c] [Ts]
fat_nutz: bets $150
BV37: folds
fat_nutz collected $1247 from pot
but as you can imagine those winners are few and far between.
Last year's stats for LO8 on Stars:

This year's stats:

Is the 30 that much tougher to beat than the 75 because of the regular players in the 30 who can't sew their vaginas shut and play the 75? That's my best guess, because I'm obviously tightening up according to the average number of players at the table. Could also be a small sample size issue, and I'm either a winner at 30 longrun or a loser at 75... but the results look consistent over this timeframe, and the stdev's are at 20BB/100 for both levels, meaning that after 10k hands the CI is only about 10BB wide.
It's also evident that I'm loosening up from last year to this year, I take this as an indication that I need to stop playing when I'm stoned off my ass. For some reason when I take down a couple bowls I start to see all these weird ways that I might be able to snake the occasional pot here and there that I don't normally "see." Fun when it works out, like here:
POKERSTARS GAME #9721638744: OMAHA HI/LO LIMIT ($75/$150) - 2007/05/02 - 21:53:44 (ET)
Table 'Koon IV' 10-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: BV37 ($2000 in chips)
Seat 2: Elliesa ($4335.50 in chips)
Seat 3: fat_nutz ($2298.50 in chips)
Seat 5: mrb513 ($8066 in chips)
Seat 6: bostoner ($2267.50 in chips)
Seat 9: berdyfish ($3072 in chips)
fat_nutz: posts small blind $50
wausau1: is sitting out
mrb513: posts big blind $75
BV37: posts small & big blinds $125
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to fat_nutz [Kd 9c 2c 4h]
bostoner: folds
wausau1 has returned
berdyfish: folds
BV37: raises $75 to $150
Elliesa: folds
fat_nutz: calls $100
mrb513: calls $75
*** FLOP *** [Js Qd 4c]
fat_nutz: checks
mrb513: bets $75
BV37: raises $75 to $150
fat_nutz: calls $150
mrb513: calls $75
*** TURN *** [Js Qd 4c] [8c]
fat_nutz: checks
mrb513: checks
BV37: bets $150
fat_nutz: calls $150
mrb513: folds
*** RIVER *** [Js Qd 4c 8c] [Ts]
fat_nutz: bets $150
BV37: folds
fat_nutz collected $1247 from pot
but as you can imagine those winners are few and far between.























